(This is a fairly long article, Word Count 1657 for print out)
    Religion in education

    Tony Blair is the most overtly Christian Prime Minister since Gladstone.
    His public display of Christianity, together with declarations of strong
    religious convictions by most of his shadow cabinet prior to the 1997
    General Election, had an ominous ring.
    Previous Prime Ministers have flaunted their Christianity, but the
    intensity and persistence with which Blair has done so has made it
    inevitable that religion would play a larger part in society regardless
    of the declining support for superstitious beliefs and rituals.
    The fight against religious indoctrination in schools has continued in
    many countries for a long time. In Dayton, Tennessee, in 1925, John
    Thomas Scopes was fined $100 dollars for teaching evolution to
    schoolchildren.
    Today, the advocacy of religion in the USA violates First Amendment
    rights. But in 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that the teaching of
    creationism violated those rights when fundamentalists tried to inflict
    their beliefs in schools.
    MaryKait Durkee, a 15-year-old schoolgirl in San Diego county,
    California was bullied by teachers, pupils and administrators when she
    refused to stand up for the Pledge of Allegiance in 1998 because it
    contained the words "... under God". The American Civil Liberties Union
    took legal action and the case was settled out of court.
    In Australia, Nigel Sinnott, an NSS member and former editor of the
    'Freethinker' won a battle to have the Loyal Declaration changed at
    Alexandra Primary School, Victoria attended by his 10-year-old daughter
    Miriam in 1999. The Loyal Declaration contained the words "I love God".
    In England and Wales nearly one million children attend the Church of
    England's 4,920 schools, of which about 150 are secondary schools. The
    Roman Catholic Church has about twice the number of secondary schools.
    About one-third of schools are religious schools and the Church of
    England is trying to increase this number. As church attendance falls
    the opportunity to proselytise to a captive audience of young children
    is being seized. A Consultation Report: the Church Schools Review Group
    states: "As never before in 50 years, the Church has a great opportunity
    to pursue and develop its mission to the nation through its schools, as
    nowhere else."
    The Chief Rabbi, Dr Jonathan Sacks, called for more Jewish schools to be
    built in response to declining congregations. He said in an interview
    last year: "Jews in Britain are so well-integrated. We remember we are
    British but forget we are Jews." and: "I am very worried about
    disaffiliation, which is why we must make massive efforts to reach
    people within our own community."
    The Government has issued a Green Paper on Education: Schools, BUILDING
    ON SUCCESS - a slight euphemism at a time when teachers are considering
    strike action and the Government has admitted that class sizes have
    risen. But a Cabinet comprised of members who believe in virgin births
    can believe almost anything.
    The Government's Green Paper proposes a reduction in the 15% that faith
    communities currently contribute towards the cost of premises to 10% for
    Voluntary Aided Schools.
    The Green Paper also states that for the first time Muslim, Sikh and
    Greek Orthodox schools have been brought into the state system and are
    funded on the same basis as Church of England and Roman Catholic
    schools. The number of Jewish schools has also been increased. In
    addition, the contribution for revenue items by the schools is to be
    removed. The Green Paper states: "This will make life much easier for
    these schools and will further promote diversity".
    The Church of England has not always been as enthusiastic about
    education: in 1807 the bishops in the House of Lords opposed free
    education and it was not until W.E. Forster's Education Act of 1870 that
    there was provision for state education. Uneducated people are more
    susceptible to superstitious ideas. Educated people can read,
    question ideas and make decisions.
    Forster's Education Act established a dual system in which
    voluntary schools were managed by the churches and state schools by
    elected School Boards. The School Boards were replaced by Local
    Authorities in 1902.
    The 1944 Education Act gave the voluntary schools extra funding. The Act
    also made religious instruction a compulsory subject - in fact the only
    compulsory subject in the curriculum. The Act also made it compulsory
    for schools to hold an act of collective worship - usually called the
    morning assembly.
    In 1996 the Coventry and Warwickshire Humanists produced a leaflet,
    'We're Getting the Hell Out of Here'. The leaflet points out that: 'If
    you are not convinced by Christian claims - because you are agnostic,
    atheist, Buddhist, Hindu, Humanist, Judaist, Muslim, or just doubtful -
    you can choose to withdraw from collective worship in your school. You
    don't have to give any reason'.
    A 1995 survey of 15,361 British schoolchildren aged 13 to 15 found that
    one-in-three are agnostic and one-quarter are atheists - a majority.
    The 1988 Education Reform Act made a token attempt to recognise the
    multicultural nature of British society by making religious education
    broadly Christian, but this has tended to aggravate rather than improve
    the situation.
    In 1996 there were 400,000 Muslim children of school age. In state
    schools in West Yorkshire the parents of 1,500 pupils exercised their
    right to remove Muslim children from religious education classes. Some
    parents complained that Islamic law bans drawing the human body, and
    using musical instruments in music lessons exposes children to Western
    culture which is perceived as riddled with sex and drugs. The 1993
    Education Act teaches the basics of reproduction and the textbook
    diagrams are considered pornographic.
    Multi-faith teaching was intended to avoid giving offence to minority
    religions. But each religion regards itself as exclusive and other
    religions as false or blasphemous. The 1988 Act was bound to fail.
    Rabbi Julia Neuberger commented in 1996: "Children who will grow up in a
    multi-faith society should learn to live together, and they can only
    learn that by being at school together."
    "...some evidence suggests that suggests that sectarian education is
    actively harmful. It can lead to sectarian tensions, or at least to
    extend their life, as Northern Ireland has shown."
    The withdrawal of non-European, non-white children from religious
    education emphasises racial differences and makes integration more
    difficult. Muslim schools are unlikely to foster good educational
    standards for girls: fundamentalists have killed schoolgirls and women
    teachers in Algeria.
    Religious segregation in schools started in February 1996 when an Imam
    taught separate religious education lessons at Birchfield Community
    School in Birmingham. Section 26(4) of the 1944 Education Act permits
    pupils to receive RE lessons on school premises '...in accordance with
    the tenets of a particular religious denomination' provided the costs do
    not come from public funds.
    A few fundamentalist Christian schools have succeeded in obtaining
    grant-maintained status. Religious groups, when strong enough, crush
    opponents but when they lack power form strange alliances. Hindus and
    Muslims have supported attempts by fundamentalist Christians to obtain funding. This is merely a tactical ploy to pave the way for funding for themselves.
    As fewer people are Christians, schools have difficulty in finding
    teachers willing to teach RE. An east London school introduced
    'worthship', removing religion from its daily assemblies, but the
    parents of one of the children complained and Jacqui Smith, the schools
    minister, instructed the school to hold an act of daily worship and keep
    records.
    It is claimed that parents want church schools when, in fact, they want
    good schools. In some urban areas church schools have a good record by
    selectively accepting children from middle-class homes. Admission on
    religious grounds leads to the hypocrisy of parents claiming religious
    affiliation to gain entry for their children.
    In rural areas it is not unusual for all the infants' schools to be
    Church of England schools. The schools, unable to be selective, are no
    better than non-denominational schools. Indeed, because these schools
    are often quite small, ambitious, dynamic teachers may be deterred from
    seeking employment in them because of the limited chances of promotion.
    The churches tried to gain exemption from legislation preventing
    discrimination in employment. In practice, the shortage of teachers
    would probably prevent discrimination in employment but would harm the
    promotion prospects of teachers who did not adhere to the religious
    ethos of the school.
    Sectarian schools are abhorrent, but unless repressive measures are
    taken to stop them - which is to be deplored - then they will continue,
    at least in the private sector. Fundamentalists will attempt to
    brainwash children in their own homes anyway and no amount of
    legislation can prevent that. Repressive measures fail to win the
    argument and create martyrs which feeds the sado-masochistic tendencies
    of religious fanatics.
    The Catholic Church has been shaken by a legal challenge by atheists to
    have their 12-year-old son, Nathan Mackay from Livingston, educated at
    St. Margaret's Academy, West Lothian.
    The National Secular Society has actively opposed the proposed increase
    in church schools and a number of clergymen are also opposed to
    indoctrination in this way because it tends to turn children off
    religion. But teaching superstition as fact is not merely dishonest, it
    takes up time which could be used to teach more useful subjects.
    The churches are determined not to fade away without a fight. Aided by a
    sympathetic Christian Prime Minister they are seizing the opportunity to
    proselytise to vulnerable children. We must oppose their attempts to
    force their superstitious beliefs in an increasingly secular society.
    More sources of information on Education:-
    www.secularism.org.uk and www.c.s.e.freeuk.com